Artificial general intelligence - a system that can handle any intellectual task a human can - is the holy grail of AI research and the source of its most heated arguments. Current AI systems are narrow: they can write text, generate images, or play chess, but they can't flexibly move between tasks the way a human can. AGI would change that. Some prominent figures, including leaders at major AI labs, claim AGI could arrive within a few years. Others argue it's decades away, or that current approaches will never get there. The disagreement isn't minor - it's fundamental, reflecting deep differences in how researchers think about intelligence itself. For your purposes, what matters is this: AGI doesn't exist yet, and there's no consensus on when or if it will. Making business or personal decisions based on AGI arriving soon is speculative. Making decisions based on what AI can do today and is likely to do in the next two to three years is practical. The capabilities that already exist are transformative enough to warrant your attention without invoking a hypothetical future superintelligence.